{"id":66,"date":"2005-07-02T15:28:51","date_gmt":"2005-07-02T22:28:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/?p=66"},"modified":"2005-07-02T15:28:51","modified_gmt":"2005-07-02T22:28:51","slug":"im-fed-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/?p=66","title":{"rendered":"I&#8217;m &#8220;fed&#8221; up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/layer8.typepad.com\/layer_8\/\/grammar.jpeg\" border=\"0\" height=\"107\" width=\"98\" alt=\"grammar.jpeg\" align=\"left\" hspace=\"5\" vspace=\"5\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Generally I&#8217;m not one to fret too much about the ongoing evolution of language.  Slang doesn&#8217;t bother me; in fact, I was amused and more pleased than not when &#8220;bootylicious&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.askoxford.com\/pressroom\/archive\/odelaunch\/\">made the OED<\/a>.  I&#8217;ll generally argue on the side of communicative flexibility in questions of what&#8217;s correct (e.g. the begging of questions).  And, of course, &#8220;embiggen&#8221;, &#8220;unpossible&#8221;, and &#8220;cromulent&#8221; are, well, perfectly <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cromulent#Cromulent\">cromulent<\/a> words in my book.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll admit that I find the chronic misuse of other aspects of our language more irritating.  The contraction &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and the possessive &#8220;its&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.stormloader.com\/garyes\/its\/#top\">just aren&#8217;t that hard to keep straight<\/a>, and the frequency with which I see intelligent and otherwise literate-seeming people use &#8220;apostrophe&#8217;s&#8221; [sic] where <a href=\"http:\/\/alt-usage-english.org\/excerpts\/fxwheret.html\">none are required<\/a> continues to baffle me.<\/p>\n<p>I am far from a grammar or language snob, really.  I&#8217;ve never been an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fbesp.org\/blog\/\">English teacher<\/a>, and my grammar skills are only passable.  I&#8217;ll carelessly interchange &#8220;I&#8217;m doing good&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m doing well&#8221;, for example, even though I technically know better.  I struggle with &#8220;affect&#8221; vs. &#8220;effect&#8221; from time to time, and I probably don&#8217;t google for help every time I should, thus occasionally contributing to our language&#8217;s slide towards an exclusively phonetic standard of communicativeness.  While I happily work with and respect many people who have a copy of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/tg\/detail\/-\/020530902X?v=glance\">Strunk &#038; White<\/a> on their desk at the office, I don&#8217;t even know which shelf contains the copy we have at home.<\/p>\n<p>With all that said, I put gratuitous quotes with &#8220;its&#8221; vs. &#8220;it&#8217;s&#8221; and errant apostrophes on the list of annoying and common errors.  While driving down I-94 earlier in the week, I saw a semi cab with the following painted on the back:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>My way &#8220;is&#8221; the highway<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Obviously, this is intended as some sort of amusing twist on &#8220;my way or the highway&#8221;.  Regardless of its humor content (or lack thereof), why in the world is &#8220;is&#8221; in quotes?  &#8220;Is&#8221; isn&#8217;t being discussed, as it is in this sentence.  This isn&#8217;t a case of <a href=\"http:\/\/webster.commnet.edu\/grammar\/marks\/quotation.htm\">using quotes to identify an ironic use of a word<\/a> (examples <a href=\"http:\/\/isu.indstate.edu\/writing\/handouts\/setiv\/prints\/SETIV15P.html\">here<\/a>).  &#8220;Is&#8221; is the verb, for crying out loud!<\/p>\n<p>Given the patterns this usage clearly does not fit, I can only assume that the intent of this airbrushing was emphatic, as in &#8220;My way <u>is<\/u> the highway&#8221; or &#8220;My way <b>is<\/b> the highway&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this use of quotes a fair bit lately, and I think that may have to do with the increasing use of largely plain text communications media (email, IM, text messaging).  For some reason, the geek-popular _inline_ _underline_ isn&#8217;t very popular (I suppose non-geeks don&#8217;t have much use for the underscore).  If plain text emphasis without underscores is the goal, I&#8217;d personally find *this* approach preferable, as it at least doesn&#8217;t overlap with other existing notation.<\/p>\n<p>As I drove down I-94, thinking about the &#8220;is&#8221; situation, I remembered the sign one of the english teachers in my high school had posted in a hall-facing window every student walked by thousands of times before graduating.  The sign read:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A lot is two words.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever even paused to consider writing &#8220;alot&#8221;.  The gratuitous quote situation could use similar handling, in my opinion.  Just today I saw a sign at a retail clothing store that read:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Buy one, get one &#8220;free&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(Is it not really free?) <\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s fortunate, in times like this, that the Internet has decentralized and distributed the power once held only by high school English teachers.  Now, thanks to a few minutes with the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.gimp.org\/\">GIMP<\/a> and cafepress, &#8220;you too&#8221; can help spread the word<\/p>\n<p>:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cafepress.com\/netfluvia.25468316\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/layer8.typepad.com\/layer_8\/\/quote.jpg\" border=\"0\" height=\"112\" width=\"112\" alt=\"quote.jpg\" align=\"center\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>To start I&#8217;ve just made a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cafepress.com\/netfluvia.25468316\">3&#215;5&#8243; sticker<\/a> ($2.49 at cost) &#8211; I can easily make other shapes or items available if there&#8217;s interest.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Generally I&#8217;m not one to fret too much about the ongoing evolution of language. Slang doesn&#8217;t bother me; in fact, I was amused and more pleased than not when &#8220;bootylicious&#8221; made the OED. I&#8217;ll generally argue on the side of communicative flexibility in questions of what&#8217;s correct (e.g. the begging of questions). And, of course, <a href='https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/?p=66'>[&#8230;]<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-miscellany","category-4-id","post-seq-1","post-parity-odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=66"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=66"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=66"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.netfluvia.org\/layer8\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=66"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}