Riotpolice

As the Ukraine teeters on the brink of widespread “civil” conflict over disputed election results, the U.S. is urging the government to hold off certification of results until fraud and voting irregularity allegations have been investigated:

The White House said in a statement: “We strongly support efforts to review the conduct of the election and urge Ukrainian authorities not to certify results until investigations of organised fraud are resolved.”

At the same time, a federal judge has ruled that Ohio’s recount can wait until after result certification, at which point only 9 days will remain before electors meet.

Looking at the picture of flowers in riot shields, and hearing of 200,000 people in the streets of Kiev, I am reminded of relativepath’s recent introspection about identifying the “good guys” in Fallujah [my paraphrase]. There is little direct relation in terms of subject matter, but for the question:

What is your breaking point?  Are we past it?  What will it look like when it comes?

Ukraine. Ohio. Who is the beacon of democracy and freedom?

 

Paul Krugman was interviewed by Reuters yesterday, and provided a pretty gloomy assessment:

A deeper plunge in the already battered U.S. dollar is another possible route to crisis, the professor said.

The absence of any mention of currencies in a communique from the Group of 20 rich and emerging market countries this past weekend only reinforced investors’ perception that the United States, while saying it promotes a strong dollar, is willing to let its currency slide further.

“The break can come either from the Reserve Bank of China deciding it has enough dollars, thank you, or from private investors saying ‘I’m going to take a speculative bet on a dollar plunge,’ which then ends up being a self-fulfilling prophecy,” Krugman opined. “Both scenarios are pretty unnerving.”

In the longer-term, Bush’s version of social security reform, which Krugman says would relegate pensions for the elderly to the whims of volatile financial markets, could have wide-ranging implications for future generations.

But at least there’s an upside:

“I do believe at some point there is going to be a popular tidal wave against what has happened,” concluded Krugman. “In the meantime, you keep banging on the drum, you keep telling the truth.

“And then eventually we have the great demonstrations, which I think are important to let the government know that many Americans are not happy with what is happening,” he said.

This, the same week that the administration’s ideas for its second-term tax plan come out. The highlights: eliminate investment income taxes by removing the deduction for state and local taxes, and “scrapping the business tax deduction for employer-provided health insurance”. Unbelievable.

As MaxSpeak points out, the former amounts — coincidentally, I’m sure — to a tax on the blue states:

The income tax deduction chiefly benefits blue states. Texas and Florida, just to take two wildly random examples, have no state income tax. In the most recent tax legislation, a new tax cut was added for state sales taxes, ostensibly to put states with no income tax on the same footing as the others. Now that they are equalized in this way, the stage is set to remove both deductions simultaneously. What could be more fair?

The health insurance one leaves me somewhat speechless. Where was that during the domestic policy part of the debates? Salon [truthout has full text for non-subscribers] opines persuasively on the likely impact (hint: in 2008 Kerry or whomever will have an even bigger number of recently uninsured for the stump).

 

It’s been a busy few days for CIA news. First, Michael Scheuer (the author, as “Anonymous”, of Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror) resigned on Thursday.

On Friday, deputy director John McLaughlin resigned with a warning that “widespread resignations” were possible, inspired by agency management since the new CIA Director Porter Goss and team have started:

Several other senior clandestine service officers are threatening to leave, current and former agency officials said.

The disruption comes as the CIA is trying to stay abreast of a worldwide terrorist threat from al Qaeda, a growing insurgency in Iraq, the return of the Taliban in Afghanistan and congressional proposals to reorganize the intelligence agencies. The agency also has been criticized for not preventing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and not accurately assessing Saddam Hussein’s ability to produce weapons of mass destruction.

“It’s the worst roiling I’ve ever heard of,” said one former senior official with knowledge of the events. “There’s confusion throughout the ranks and an extraordinary loss of morale and incentive.”

Current and retired senior managers have criticized Goss, former chairman of the House intelligence committee, for not interacting with senior managers and for giving Murray too much authority over day-to-day operations. Murray was Goss’s chief of staff on the intelligence committee.

At the same time, the Deputy Director of Operations Stephen Kappes delivered his resignation, though was convinced by Goss and the White House to hold a final decision off until Monday morning.

Newsday (via DailyKos) connects the dots today: this is an intentional move ordered by the White House to purge the CIA of voices who have been critical of administration policies:

“The agency is being purged on instructions from the White House,” said a former senior CIA official who maintains close ties to both the agency and to the White House. “Goss was given instructions … to get rid of those soft leakers and liberal Democrats. The CIA is looked on by the White House as a hotbed of liberals and people who have been obstructing the president’s agenda.”

Politicizing intelligence in this manner can only enhance the echo chamber effect — that non-critical positive feedback loop that amounts to an institutional yes-man — which basically means it’s no longer adding value. That is not good — disturbing as the threats we face may be, we need now as much as (or more than) ever to perceive reality as clearly and accurately as possible, not to structurally guarantee that we only see pre-approved realities.

 

Via Boing Boing,
a Latvian artist decomposed an animation of a walking robot into a series of stencils, which were painted onto various urban scenes.

The result is stunning.

 

It seems to be getting hard to publicly point out that war is a horrible thing that kills people and generally sucks.

Today brought two terrifying data points. Note that neither is even about any of the particular wars in which we are currently involved, but rather the general idea of organized armed conflict.

First, 66 ABC affiliates decided not to show the film Saving Private Ryan, apparently due to concern that its graphic descriptions of WWII might incur large fines from the FCC in the post-we’ve-seen-Janet-Jackson’s-breast era. This despite the fact that it has been broadcast on ABC on two previous occasions. Is war only “decent” enough for TV when we’re not fighting any?

But wait — there’s more. ABC News via boingboing via backchannel relativepath (thanks!), the United States Secret Service investigated some Boulder, CO high school students simply for singing a forty year old folk song that questions if profit justifies war:

The students told ABC News affiliate KMGH-TV in Denver they are performing Bob Dylan’s song “Masters of War” during the Boulder High School Talent Exposé because they are Dylan fans. They said they want to express their views and show off their musical abilities.

This falls under the Secret Service’s bailiwick, we’re told, because apparently singing this song amounts to threatening the president’s life:

Threatening the president is a federal crime, so the Secret Service was called to the school to investigate.

Students in the band said they’re just singing the lyrics and not inciting anyone to do anything.

The 1963 song ends with the lyrics: “You might say that I’m young. You might say I’m unlearned, but there’s one thing I know, though I’m younger than you, even Jesus would never forgive what you do … And I hope that you die and your death’ll come soon. I will follow your casket in the pale afternoon. And I’ll watch while you’re lowered down to your deathbed. And I’ll stand o’er your grave ’til I’m sure that you’re dead.”

The first stanza of this song identifies those to whom the closing sentiment is addressed:

Come you masters of war
You that build all the guns
You that build the death planes
You that build the big bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks

To confuse non-original song lyrics with the sort of threat that warrants Secret Service investigation is absurd and chilling. In fact, the Secret Service’s FAQ rather clearly and reasonably discusses the difference:

The Secret Service does not desire or solicit information pertaining to individuals or groups expressing legitimate criticism of, or political opposition to, the policies and decisions of the government of government officials. However, we are interested in legitimate information relating to threats, plans or attempts by individuals, groups or organizations to harm USSS protectees.

According to ABC News, the Secret Service got involved after a group of students and adults who heard a rehearsal called a radio talk show “saying the song the band sang ended with a call for President Bush to die”, and then someone called the Secret Service. I assume that the Secret Service takes all reported threats seriously, but then does do some degree of actual vetting before sending agents to investigate. The Secret Service actually spent time interviewing the students’ principal as well as a teacher involved in an unrelated student protest last weekend (whaa-?), so presumably someone decided that this was an actual threat. (Note that there is no hint anywhere that the evidence of “threat” goes in any respect beyond singing this song.)

We are so very far through the looking-glass. Even knowing that, what I find amazing is that the talk-show callers, whoever called the Secret Service, and apparently some decision maker all seem to have read the first stanza of this song to identify the sitting POTUS, but that doesn’t seem to bother any of them. One of the performers hits the nail on the head (again from ABC):

“It’s just Bob Dylan’s song. We were just singing Bob Dylan’s song … If you think it has to do with Bush that’s because you’re drawing your own conclusions. We never conveyed that Bush was the person we were talking about,” said Allysse Wojtanek-Watson, a singer for the band.

If you haven’t heard the song or read the lyrics lately, check it out. It’s one of those Dylan songs that send shivers down my spine, and on the “moral values” scale, it certainly surpasses fretting about love between people with similar genitalia.

It’s encouraging that these students are acting with such conscience and bravery, and it’s great that their principal supported them and the performance went off as planned. However, that small silver lining is dwarfed by the impact this sort of exercise of state power has on the broader discussion climate in our country. Boulder is, after all, a very progressive city, and this event sends a pretty strong signal to school administrators and others in less progressive places (like Richland County, WI, or 66 local ABC TV markets).

My hat is off to those fighting the good fight in Boulder, but I hold it over a heart that increasingly quivers for our country. We are not acting like a very good beacon of democracy and freedom at the moment.

 

This one’s for you, Jon.

Via Feedster RSS Feed for Video Clips Enclosures, one of the funniest Daily Show segments ever: Birds of a Feather: “

If you haven’t seen this, stop whatever you’re doing now, and go watch it. Seriously. It is that funny.

 

Girlshoodio

News.com reports that Gap will have a kids’ fleece jacket with an integrated radio [speakers in the hood, hence it’s IMHO unfortunate name – “Hoodio”] in stores on Monday for $68.

This is, like the Roomba, notable as it marks the first real application of a new technology in a form that could conceivably result in large scale adoption. That’s cool.

Unfortunately, the Hoodie seems like a bit of a contradiction — it’s a jacket with integrated electronics, but it only lets you access a has-been medium (FM). One can only hope that there’s a headphone jack for the iPod connection its users will certainly want (though integrated iPod controls would be so much cooler).

Gizmodo has more pictures.

 

If you haven’t yet read this week’s Savage Love, check it out. Well said, Dan.

 

The BBC summary of the first day of the Falluja offensive paints a pretty grim picture. The 11 US soldiers killed yesterday (3 confirmed for Tuesday so far for a total of 14) have been widely covered in the media. The 30,000 to 50,000 estimated civilians left in Fallujah are currently without water, power, or the ability to leave their houses (what with the curfew, bullets, and explosions) with a limited supply of food.

What struck me in the BBC article was the number of insurgents thought to be in Fallujah currently: 3000. Despite Donald “Mr. Reliable” Rumsfeld’s assurance that:

There aren’t going to be large numbers of civilians killed and certainly not by U.S. forces.

the peril in which we have put the poorest (read: least able to evacuate) citizens of Fallujah in order to capture or kill absolutely no more than 1/10th their number is troubling. I have not seen civilian casualty reports yet, and given our early (and accomplished) objective of capturing the hospital and preventing civilian emergency vehicles from accessing it [sorry- can’t find that link at the moment], we may not. Of course, war is a very ugly beast, and I wouldn’t be surprised if that ratio is within certain formal theoretical parameters of “acceptable loss”. However, given (the NYT and rumor control via) relative path’s revelation that the Fallujah to Ramadi insurgent escape chute is unsecured, it seems unlikely that the number of insurgents killed or captured will exceed the number intentionally sacrificed by the insurgency for this PR event.

I wonder if Rumsfeld is as sanguine about how 50,000 poor Iraqi civilians without water, power, food watching US bombs and tanks crush their city will play in the Arab press. The BBC’s translation service provides a preview, which is neither surprising nor encouraging.

 

SorryworldRegarding the events of last Tuesday, this site has over 600 (and counting, it seems) photo apologies from US citizens to the world: http://www.sorryeverybody.com/.

© 2021 layer8 Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha