jrh

 

It seems to be getting hard to publicly point out that war is a horrible thing that kills people and generally sucks.

Today brought two terrifying data points. Note that neither is even about any of the particular wars in which we are currently involved, but rather the general idea of organized armed conflict.

First, 66 ABC affiliates decided not to show the film Saving Private Ryan, apparently due to concern that its graphic descriptions of WWII might incur large fines from the FCC in the post-we’ve-seen-Janet-Jackson’s-breast era. This despite the fact that it has been broadcast on ABC on two previous occasions. Is war only “decent” enough for TV when we’re not fighting any?

But wait — there’s more. ABC News via boingboing via backchannel relativepath (thanks!), the United States Secret Service investigated some Boulder, CO high school students simply for singing a forty year old folk song that questions if profit justifies war:

The students told ABC News affiliate KMGH-TV in Denver they are performing Bob Dylan’s song “Masters of War” during the Boulder High School Talent Exposé because they are Dylan fans. They said they want to express their views and show off their musical abilities.

This falls under the Secret Service’s bailiwick, we’re told, because apparently singing this song amounts to threatening the president’s life:

Threatening the president is a federal crime, so the Secret Service was called to the school to investigate.

Students in the band said they’re just singing the lyrics and not inciting anyone to do anything.

The 1963 song ends with the lyrics: “You might say that I’m young. You might say I’m unlearned, but there’s one thing I know, though I’m younger than you, even Jesus would never forgive what you do … And I hope that you die and your death’ll come soon. I will follow your casket in the pale afternoon. And I’ll watch while you’re lowered down to your deathbed. And I’ll stand o’er your grave ’til I’m sure that you’re dead.”

The first stanza of this song identifies those to whom the closing sentiment is addressed:

Come you masters of war
You that build all the guns
You that build the death planes
You that build the big bombs
You that hide behind walls
You that hide behind desks
I just want you to know
I can see through your masks

To confuse non-original song lyrics with the sort of threat that warrants Secret Service investigation is absurd and chilling. In fact, the Secret Service’s FAQ rather clearly and reasonably discusses the difference:

The Secret Service does not desire or solicit information pertaining to individuals or groups expressing legitimate criticism of, or political opposition to, the policies and decisions of the government of government officials. However, we are interested in legitimate information relating to threats, plans or attempts by individuals, groups or organizations to harm USSS protectees.

According to ABC News, the Secret Service got involved after a group of students and adults who heard a rehearsal called a radio talk show “saying the song the band sang ended with a call for President Bush to die”, and then someone called the Secret Service. I assume that the Secret Service takes all reported threats seriously, but then does do some degree of actual vetting before sending agents to investigate. The Secret Service actually spent time interviewing the students’ principal as well as a teacher involved in an unrelated student protest last weekend (whaa-?), so presumably someone decided that this was an actual threat. (Note that there is no hint anywhere that the evidence of “threat” goes in any respect beyond singing this song.)

We are so very far through the looking-glass. Even knowing that, what I find amazing is that the talk-show callers, whoever called the Secret Service, and apparently some decision maker all seem to have read the first stanza of this song to identify the sitting POTUS, but that doesn’t seem to bother any of them. One of the performers hits the nail on the head (again from ABC):

“It’s just Bob Dylan’s song. We were just singing Bob Dylan’s song … If you think it has to do with Bush that’s because you’re drawing your own conclusions. We never conveyed that Bush was the person we were talking about,” said Allysse Wojtanek-Watson, a singer for the band.

If you haven’t heard the song or read the lyrics lately, check it out. It’s one of those Dylan songs that send shivers down my spine, and on the “moral values” scale, it certainly surpasses fretting about love between people with similar genitalia.

It’s encouraging that these students are acting with such conscience and bravery, and it’s great that their principal supported them and the performance went off as planned. However, that small silver lining is dwarfed by the impact this sort of exercise of state power has on the broader discussion climate in our country. Boulder is, after all, a very progressive city, and this event sends a pretty strong signal to school administrators and others in less progressive places (like Richland County, WI, or 66 local ABC TV markets).

My hat is off to those fighting the good fight in Boulder, but I hold it over a heart that increasingly quivers for our country. We are not acting like a very good beacon of democracy and freedom at the moment.

 

This one’s for you, Jon.

Via Feedster RSS Feed for Video Clips Enclosures, one of the funniest Daily Show segments ever: Birds of a Feather: “

If you haven’t seen this, stop whatever you’re doing now, and go watch it. Seriously. It is that funny.

 

Girlshoodio

News.com reports that Gap will have a kids’ fleece jacket with an integrated radio [speakers in the hood, hence it’s IMHO unfortunate name – “Hoodio”] in stores on Monday for $68.

This is, like the Roomba, notable as it marks the first real application of a new technology in a form that could conceivably result in large scale adoption. That’s cool.

Unfortunately, the Hoodie seems like a bit of a contradiction — it’s a jacket with integrated electronics, but it only lets you access a has-been medium (FM). One can only hope that there’s a headphone jack for the iPod connection its users will certainly want (though integrated iPod controls would be so much cooler).

Gizmodo has more pictures.

 

If you haven’t yet read this week’s Savage Love, check it out. Well said, Dan.

 

The BBC summary of the first day of the Falluja offensive paints a pretty grim picture. The 11 US soldiers killed yesterday (3 confirmed for Tuesday so far for a total of 14) have been widely covered in the media. The 30,000 to 50,000 estimated civilians left in Fallujah are currently without water, power, or the ability to leave their houses (what with the curfew, bullets, and explosions) with a limited supply of food.

What struck me in the BBC article was the number of insurgents thought to be in Fallujah currently: 3000. Despite Donald “Mr. Reliable” Rumsfeld’s assurance that:

There aren’t going to be large numbers of civilians killed and certainly not by U.S. forces.

the peril in which we have put the poorest (read: least able to evacuate) citizens of Fallujah in order to capture or kill absolutely no more than 1/10th their number is troubling. I have not seen civilian casualty reports yet, and given our early (and accomplished) objective of capturing the hospital and preventing civilian emergency vehicles from accessing it [sorry- can’t find that link at the moment], we may not. Of course, war is a very ugly beast, and I wouldn’t be surprised if that ratio is within certain formal theoretical parameters of “acceptable loss”. However, given (the NYT and rumor control via) relative path’s revelation that the Fallujah to Ramadi insurgent escape chute is unsecured, it seems unlikely that the number of insurgents killed or captured will exceed the number intentionally sacrificed by the insurgency for this PR event.

I wonder if Rumsfeld is as sanguine about how 50,000 poor Iraqi civilians without water, power, food watching US bombs and tanks crush their city will play in the Arab press. The BBC’s translation service provides a preview, which is neither surprising nor encouraging.

 

SorryworldRegarding the events of last Tuesday, this site has over 600 (and counting, it seems) photo apologies from US citizens to the world: http://www.sorryeverybody.com/.

 

This update includes two notable additions to the previous post about the 1166% (yes, one thousand and some percent) overstatement of the Bush tally in one precinct of Ohio’s Franklin county:

1) The machine used in this precinct is only used in this county
2) It’s not a Diebold machine

#2 is more a curiosity than anything, and #1 makes it seem less likely that a similar problem happened throughout Ohio (that is, at least as long as one assumes this was a non-intentional error).

However, CNN’s turnout numbers for Franklin county show 512,599 votes counted. It’s hard with the available data to know how this one precinct’s error would extrapolate to the county if in fact the problem were county-wide, but with over half a million votes cast, it’s not hard to imagine a county-wide problem having a bottom-line impact on the outcome.

 

I’ve been accumulating anecdotes of voting issues for later tonight when I’ll have some time to read them more carefully, but this one is too striking to let sit:

Franklin County’s unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry (news – web sites)’s 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.

Bush actually received 365 votes in the precinct…

Hmm … a 136,000 vote Bush lead / (4258 – 638 = 3620) = 37 and change.

How many precincts were using this equipment? 37 machines with a similar flaw in similar magnitude changes everything, and once provisional ballots are considered the number probably doesn’t need to be anywhere near as large.

I swore I wasn’t going to let my tin-foil hat point in this direction, but this really needs some explanation.

A question I’ve been asking a lot lately is: Why don’t we have someone publicly accounting for why it’s OK that electronic voting machines aren’t auditable? More on that later …

 

… but thank god the kids were out of school for some reason: National Guard F-16 strafes New Jersey elementary school.

As Mike joked, maybe now people will think twice about that bumper sticker about the Air Force needing to hold a bake sale … 🙂

 

I took Tuesday afternoon off of work to spend it doing whatever the Wisconsin Dems thought would be most useful. I ended up waving a Kerry Edwards sign on a street corner in a small community outside of Madison, which was actually substantially more fun than it probably sounds.

I never thought I’d see a nice-looking old grandma type give me the finger on the same afternoon I saw a middle-aged white guy give me (a not-quite-middle-aged white guy) the black power salute.

Grandma was far from alone in finding her middle finger to be the most eloquent response to “Kerry Edwards – For A Stronger America”. Other notable reacations on the not-so-positive side included:

* the old man who rolled down his window to say “you can’t possibly be that stupid” while turning

* lots of thumbs down, some with dramatic tension – as if they could _really_ get me if I thought the thumb was going up

* a pack of teenagers chanting “4 more years” from the school bus

* held noses, as if to limit the olfactory offense of my Kerry Edwards sign

* a young woman – maybe late teens or early twenties – who leaned halfway out of the passenger window of her car to deliver a two-handed bird flip while screaming “F*CK YOU” at a rather substantial volume

* the threat: “the police are on their way” (to do what, exactly? — they never came)

I woke up feeling optimistic and energized on Tuesday. From my point of view at the time, all of the above was more than offset by an outpouring of enthusiastic honking, cheering, thumbs up, and so forth. The spirit of a victory party was clear in the Kerry supporters I saw, while the Bush fans just seemed, well, angry and mean.

I’ll never know with any precision what the objective balance of opinion that drove by me on that corner was, but it was clearly a microcosm of sorts. I’ve thought about that microcosm while hearing the unity rhetoric that inevitably follows an electoral contest. GWB from yesterday’s speech:

…today I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent: To make this nation stronger and better I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust. A new term is a new opportunity to reach out to the whole nation. We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America.

This, from the man whose first 4 years as “a uniter, not a divider” have let not only to what is widely regarded as the most divisive election in 36 years, but found government institutions in substantial conflict (CIA vs. DoD/White House, for example), driven a wedge through our allies (“Old Europe”, “Freedom Fries”, and repeated willful misrepresentation of the well-intentioned but regrettable Kerry phrase “global test”), and squandered historically unprecedented worldwide unity following the attacks of September 2001. Tell me, GW, are mandatory loyalty oaths a step towards how we “come together and work together”?

I have no personal ill will for Bush supporters by virtue of their support for Bush alone (as I learned on Tuesday, the converse is apparently not true). But puh-leeze, we don’t actually have a whole lot of common cause — none of the countless substantive reasons this was such a divisive election season have changed in the past 72 hours. Quite the contrary, apparently one day of playing nice-nice was enough for the administration:

“I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it,” Bush told reporters. “It is my style.”

It’s going to be a long four years.

© 2021 layer8 Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha